I am in a small league. I have a great line-up (IMO) and am in first place by quite a bit.

The second place guy is trying to get Holmes and and Willie Parker from our last place guy in an attempt to double dip a good Pit team (he has Rothelsburger (sp?).

I have D. Anderson, Brady, Moss, Wayne as a few of my premier guys.

The question:

Would it be dumb to give the last place guy R. Wayne for S. Holmes and D. Clark -- in an attempt to block the other trade?

The only guy I'd trade from your team right now is Anderson. He has good value and you don't need him. Trade to improve YOUR team, not to impede somebody else's.

Yes, it would be dumb to do that. I agree with what Bullies said and there's no way you should trade Wayne just to prevent the other owner from having 3 steelers on his team.

Keep Wayne. You'll get more points from him than you would Holmes and Clark together.

How bad would it suck if the second place guy ended up trading for Parker and Wayne?????

I concur with all the above. That would be a foolish move. Let the owners vote to reject a lopsided trade assuming there is a voting period