Fantasy Insights Message Board
Fantasy Insights Message Board
Keepers/Trades
Should I give up Ricky Williams?|
Go
![]() |
New
![]() |
Find
![]() |
Notify
![]() |
Tools
![]() |
Reply
![]() |
|
|
Junior Member |
Roster - QB - Gannon
- griese - Stewart RB - williams - george - e smith WR - Rice - Bruce - Morgan - McCardell - McCaffery - Kennison TE - Franks K - Feeley Def - PIT Trade offer is to give up Williams for QB - Brady WR - Moulds - RB - W green, Dunn, Hambrick |
||
|
Member![]() |
I would do it. You would get a solid #2 QB, a solid #1 WR, and a solid #2 RB in Green. Plus Dunn, who actually had an O.K season last year. Hambrick could also do good. You would add a lot of needed depth with that trade. But maybe I'm wrong? Just listen to what everybody has to say.
|
|||
|
Member![]() |
I disagree,
Brady is useless to you. You have Gannon who should be top 5. Griese and Stewart will be as good as Brady for a spot start, you'll get by for the 1 week you'll need them and a couple more if Gannon goes down (doubtful) If you give up RW, you'll have 2 #2 RBs, if your lucky you'll reach the playoffs. Dunn had an OK season but that's because Ducket was out. Ducket is healthy now and will split time if not get the majority of the carries. Emmits value is as good as Dunns at this point. Stick with what you have A top 5 QB A top 2 and 15 RB Moulds would be nice but Rice, Bruce and Morgan, McAffrey and Kennison are not bad, not studs but with the right matchups that combo will score you as much as 1 stud or more. Not worth giving up one the best if not the best RB in the league. ~~~~~~ |
|||
|
|
Member |
I think the trade is exceptional but you shouldn't take it. You will be losing a great runningback in that position and you wouldnt get anything back besides moulds, green, and brady. Think about it , if those players were your backups you would not be playing them anyway , but you are giving away a prime starter. This is a definant no go and if you do pull this trade try to get one of his rb starters.
|
|||
|
|
Member |
Quantity for quality is always great if you're on the quality receiving side.
|
|||
|
|
Member |
I agree with Buckeye, a classic move is trying to draft two late rounders and trade them up for a quality early rounder. Stick with what you have.
|
|||
|
|
Member |
Always be leary about guys trying to trade you quantity for quality. Moulds is a good WR upgrade but your already thin at RB and you'd be getting a maybe, a part timer, and a never going to be in return. Brady is a great #2, but that's not alot of value when he won't play, barring bye weeks and injury to #1. Not a chance I do this deal. Depth is good to have, but not as good as being able to start true, quality players. In FF, quality almost always beats quantity.
|
|||
|
| Previous Topic | Next Topic | powered by eve community |
| Please Wait. Your request is being processed... |
|
Fantasy Insights Message Board
Fantasy Insights Message Board
Keepers/Trades
Should I give up Ricky Williams?
