Fantasy Insights    Fantasy Insights Message Board    Fantasy Insights Message Board  Hop To Forum Categories  Keepers/Trades    D. Driver for Gonzo & Nate Washington?
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
-star Rating Rate It!  Login/Join 
Member
Posted
I got this offer yesterday and I'm not sure if I want it or not.
With my roster full, I'd drop S. Alexander or C. Palmer to even it up.
Also, my biggest thing is that Driver is valuable to me now, but I could see a lot of the Packer's starters sitting in the last few weeks...
What do you guys think?

edit: FYI - my other WR's are Hines & Desean J., with Dante S'worth on the bench...
 
Posts: 11 | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of TenTimes
Posted Hide Post
Little more info would help. Scoring type, starting roster requirements, is that the Chiefs' or Colts' "Gonzo", who else do you have at tight end, etc.


Without knowing any of this info, and assuming this is Tony Gonzalez the tight end, in a tight end required league, I'd say this deal is in your favor. Nate Washington's stock is rising lately.
 
Posts: 7121 | Location: seattle, wa | Registered: April 21, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Sorry for being too general. Smile
Gonzo is actually in reference to the Colts Gonzo, and this isn't a PPR league, only 1pt./10yds & 6/td.
The lineup requirements, (what I would think is standard, but my experience is limited to yahoo & espn), is 1qb, 2rb, 2wr, 1rb/wr, 1te, 1k, & 1Def.
 
Posts: 11 | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
Although flex lineups are far more popular than they used to be they are still far from standard.

If this is a redraft or even a fairly shallow keeper I wouldn't do the trade. In a dynasty I might change my mind.
 
Posts: 9670 | Location: Baraboo WI | Registered: March 28, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
The league is in fact a 3 person keeper, with 20 teams in the league. I like Driver, but I don't think I would be interested in keeping him for next year.
I do worry about Driver possibly sitting late this season, ie, week 17 when I will (hopefully) really need him.
I could certainly see Anthony Gonzales & Washington having more production during the playoff weeks...
But maybe it's too early to be worrying about that.
 
Posts: 11 | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of TenTimes
Posted Hide Post
I would just hold on to Driver. I don't think you will be keeping any of these three players so don't worry about that too much. Why are you worried about Driver sitting late in the season?
 
Posts: 7121 | Location: seattle, wa | Registered: April 21, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Posted Hide Post
I had envisioned the packers with a more commanding lead in the north division for some reason. But in light of today's loss to the vikings, the point seems moot.
I guess I will hang on to DD. Thanks for the dialogue.
 
Posts: 11 | Registered: November 07, 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Member
Picture of Skip
Posted Hide Post
The Packers are an average team in an average division (minus Detroit). They are going to be in a dogfight to the end. There is no way they will be sitting anyone.


----------

"Let's eat Grandma!"
"Let's eat, Grandma!"
Punctuation. It saves lives.
 
Posts: 6288 | Location: Hartville, MO | Registered: March 03, 2000Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
  Powered by Eve Community  
 

Fantasy Insights    Fantasy Insights Message Board    Fantasy Insights Message Board  Hop To Forum Categories  Keepers/Trades    D. Driver for Gonzo & Nate Washington?

© Copyright 1996-2008 Fantasy Insights All rights reserved. Do not duplicate or redistribute.